Cases
 

Cases

 

Some cases to ponder (from the internal consulting page):

  1. Manager calls HR rep regarding a valued employee who has decided to leave because he has received an offer with another company with a substantial salary increase. Manager wants HR to meet or top this offer. This salary goes beyond the pay "band" for the position. Old response: we can’t do that – it would create an exception that we would then have to make for everyone. New response: Recognizing the value of this employee’s skills and the shortage of good skilled people, HR meets with Manager, asks questions to get a complete picture of the situation, and works with Manager to develop a creative solution to the problem, even if it creates an "exception."

  2. Quality Engineer in a manufacturing plant sees opportunities for significant reduction in scrap by redesigning the workflow processes and instituting continuous improvement techniques. Making these changes would require some re-learning from operators and supervisor, a small investment in new equipment, and would disrupt production for several days. The QE has data to show the long term benefits, even though short term there are negatives. Old response: Engineer makes changes, amid grumbling and resistance from operators and supervisors, who soon revert to working around the system to return to old ways of working. New response: Engineer, operators, supervisors, and managers collaborate to collect and analyze data, prioritize, make decisions, and implement lasting improvements.

  3. Insurance broker calls corporate underwriters regarding a difficult case, asking for certain rate structure changes in order to meet the needs of her new client. Old response: Underwriter examines the data and refuses the submission as not meeting company requirements. New response: Underwriter asks questions to fully understand the situation. Underwriter seeks input from other corporate staff and works with broker to develop an approach that accommodates this client’s needs and minimizes company risk.

  4. Finance group sends out a directive informing business units of the way financial information must be submitted each month in order to complete monthly statements. Business units request certain breakouts in order to help them better analyze local issues and improve profitability. Old response: Finance refuses: "That’s not the way we do it." New response: Finance reps take time to ask questions and listen to concerns of business units. Finance also takes time to explain why the requested changes cannot be made, and negotiates with business units to find other ways to help them analyze local issues and improve profitability.

  5. Company has emphasized a "team" approach throughout its operations. Everyone is encouraged to seek input from others before making decisions. Many meetings are held, and much discussion takes place, but decisions seem to get delayed or stuck in limbo. How do these groups achieve the goal of input and collaboration and still bring issues to closure in a reasonable time?

Up ] [ Cases ] Teambuilding ] Diversity ] Performance ] Small Business ] Change ]